Tribunal Constitution Delay: Statutory Remedy Clarified for CGST/OGST Act Appeals Under Section 112 HC addressed the non-constitution of Appellate Tribunal under CGST/OGST Act, 2017. Court disposed of writ petition by directing petitioner to file appeal ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal Constitution Delay: Statutory Remedy Clarified for CGST/OGST Act Appeals Under Section 112
HC addressed the non-constitution of Appellate Tribunal under CGST/OGST Act, 2017. Court disposed of writ petition by directing petitioner to file appeal under Section 112 once Tribunal is constituted. Statutory remedy and time limits for appeal were clarified through removal of difficulties order and circular, ensuring procedural fairness while allowing authorities to proceed legally if appeal is not filed.
Issues: 1. Non-constitution of the Appellate Tribunal under the CGST/OGST Act, 2017. 2. Availability of statutory remedy of Appeal under Section 112 of the Acts. 3. Impact of the Central Goods and Services Tax (Ninth Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2019. 4. Clarifications provided by the Circular No. 132/2/2020-GST. 5. Disposal of the writ petition with consent of the parties.
Issue 1: The primary issue in this case revolves around the non-constitution of the Appellate Tribunal under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (OGST Act). Due to the absence of the Appellate Tribunal as required under section 109 of the Acts, the petitioner is deprived of its statutory remedy of Appeal and the corresponding benefits of subsections-8 & 9 of section 112 of the said Acts.
Issue 2: The petitioner seeks to avail the statutory remedy of Appeal under the provisions of the CGST/OGST Acts. The Government of India, based on the recommendation by the GST Council, issued the Central Goods and Services Tax (Ninth Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2019 to address the situation. The Order clarifies the calculation of time periods for filing appeals, taking into account the date of communication of the order and the date on which the President or State President of the Appellate Tribunal enters office.
Issue 3: In line with the Central Goods and Services Tax (Ninth Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2019, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs issued a Circular providing further clarification regarding appeals in the absence of the Appellate Tribunal. The Circular emphasizes that the time limit for making an application to the Appellate Tribunal will be counted from the date on which the President or State President enters office.
Issue 4: Considering the Orders and Circulars mentioned above, the Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the consent of the parties. The Court directs that the petitioner must be extended the statutory benefit of stay, subject to certain conditions, and emphasizes that the petitioner should file an appeal under Section 112 of the CGST/OGST Act once the Tribunal is constituted and functional. Failure to do so would allow the respondent-Authorities to proceed further in the matter in accordance with the law.
Issue 5: The writ petition is disposed of with the mentioned directions and observations, providing the parties with certain liberties and obligations. An urgent certified copy of the order is to be issued as per rules to ensure compliance with the Court's directives and decisions.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.