Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (6) TMI 1138 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessee's appeal allowed as income addition based on ITR-service tax differences deleted after satisfactory reconciliation provided ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal regarding addition of income based on difference between ITR and service tax/GST returns. The assessee followed cash ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Assessee's appeal allowed as income addition based on ITR-service tax differences deleted after satisfactory reconciliation provided

                            ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal regarding addition of income based on difference between ITR and service tax/GST returns. The assessee followed cash accounting system recognizing only received fees as income, while service tax/GST were based on invoices issued. The AO's addition was deleted as the assessee provided satisfactory reconciliation with documentary evidence. Addition for payments to retired partners was also deleted as these were made per partnership deed terms for services rendered. The TDS credit issue was remitted back to AO for verification as directed by CIT(A).




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Addition of Rs. 147,22,44,468/- due to alleged difference between turnover/receipts as per ITR and service tax/GST returns.
                            2. Payments made to retired partners amounting to Rs. 11,49,40,775/-.
                            3. Short credit for tax deducted at source (TDS) amounting to Rs. 18,62,08,841/-.
                            4. Levy of interest under Section 234A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                            5. Levy of interest under Section 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Addition of Rs. 147,22,44,468/- due to alleged difference between turnover/receipts as per ITR and service tax/GST returns:

                            The assessee, a limited liability partnership firm providing professional services, filed its return of income for AY 2018-19. During assessment, a difference of Rs. 2294,40,98,802/- was noted between the turnover/receipts as per the ITR and the service tax return. The assessee explained this difference by stating that it follows the cash system of accounting, where only the fees received during the year are considered as income, while service tax and GST are based on invoices issued. The reconciliation provided by the assessee included out-of-pocket expenses, invoices rendered but not paid, and intra-firm invoices. The Assessing Officer initially accepted the explanation and reduced the difference to Rs. 147,22,44,468/-. However, the NFAC/CIT(A) confirmed the addition without properly considering the reconciliation and explanations provided by the assessee. The Tribunal found the reconciliation justified and deleted the addition, allowing the assessee's grounds on this issue.

                            2. Payments made to retired partners amounting to Rs. 11,49,40,775/-:

                            The assessee reduced Rs. 11,49,40,775/- from its gross receipts, which was paid to retired partners as per the partnership deed. The assessee argued that these payments were diverted by overriding title and should not be considered as income. Alternatively, the assessee claimed that these payments should be allowed as a deduction under Section 37(1) of the Act. The NFAC/CIT(A) and the Assessing Officer did not accept these arguments and added the amount to the assessee's income. The Tribunal, after considering the partnership deed and judicial precedents, concluded that the payments to retired partners were indeed diverted by overriding title and should not be considered as income of the assessee. Consequently, the addition was deleted, and the alternate plea for deduction under Section 37(1) was rendered infructuous.

                            3. Short credit for tax deducted at source (TDS) amounting to Rs. 18,62,08,841/-:

                            The assessee claimed a TDS credit of Rs. 82,84,20,418/- in its return of income, but the Assessing Officer restricted the credit to Rs. 64,22,11,577/-, resulting in a short credit of Rs. 18,62,08,841/-. The NFAC/CIT(A) directed the Assessing Officer to verify Form No. 26AS and other challan details and allow the credit accordingly. The Tribunal concurred with this direction and remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer for verification and appropriate action.

                            4. Levy of interest under Section 234A of the Income-tax Act, 1961:

                            The NFAC/CIT(A) confirmed the levy of interest under Section 234A, which the assessee contested, arguing that the return of income was filed within the due date. The Tribunal did not specifically address this issue, as it was consequential to the main issues decided.

                            5. Levy of interest under Section 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961:

                            Similar to the issue under Section 234A, the NFAC/CIT(A) confirmed the levy of interest under Section 234C. The assessee argued that the interest should be levied on the returned income. The Tribunal did not specifically address this issue, as it was also consequential to the main issues decided.

                            Conclusion:

                            The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the additions made on account of the difference in turnover/receipts and payments to retired partners. The issue of short credit for TDS was remitted to the Assessing Officer for verification. The issues related to the levy of interest under Sections 234A and 234C were not specifically adjudicated, as they were consequential in nature. The order was pronounced in the open court on 21 June 2024.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found