TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules in favor of assessee on payment to retired partners & TDS interest</h1> <h3>ACIT, Non-Corporate Cirlce-1 (1), Chennai Versus M/s Deloitte Haskins & Sells And Vice-Versa</h3> ACIT, Non-Corporate Cirlce-1 (1), Chennai Versus M/s Deloitte Haskins & Sells And Vice-Versa - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance of payment made to retired partners2. Disallowance of interest on TDSIssue 1: Disallowance of payment made to retired partnersThe appeal by the Revenue and the Cross objection by the assessee arose from the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) in Appeal No.71/CIT(A)-2/2015-16. The main issue was whether the disallowance of payment made to retired partners amounting to Rs. 1,58,56,741 was justified. The assessee, a firm of chartered accountants, claimed that the payment was diverted to retired partners as per the partnership deed. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the payment was an application of income and brought it to tax. However, the ld CITA, following a tribunal decision in the assessee's favor for a previous year, deleted the addition made by the AO. The Revenue contended that the payment to retired partners was not allowable under the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found that the issue was settled by decisions of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court and dismissed the Revenue's grounds.Issue 2: Disallowance of interest on TDSThe second issue involved the disallowance of interest on TDS amounting to Rs. 1,18,902. The AO disallowed this amount, considering it not an allowable deduction. The assessee argued that the interest was compensatory in nature as it arose due to a delay in remitting TDS belonging to the payees, not the assessee. The ld CITA upheld the AO's decision, stating that the interest on delayed remittance of TDS was not an allowable deduction. However, the tribunal found that the interest paid for delayed remittance of TDS was compensatory in nature and hence an allowable deduction. The tribunal allowed the grounds raised by the assessee in its cross objections.In conclusion, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the cross objections of the assessee were allowed. The tribunal's decision highlighted the distinction between the application of income and compensatory nature of payments, ultimately upholding the assessee's position on both issues.
TaxTMI 