Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (6) TMI 868 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Dredging company wins on charter hire TDS and transfer pricing but loses on technical services adjustment ITAT Chennai ruled on multiple tax issues for a dredging company. The tribunal held that bare-boat charter hire payments to Belgium companies are not ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Dredging company wins on charter hire TDS and transfer pricing but loses on technical services adjustment

                            ITAT Chennai ruled on multiple tax issues for a dredging company. The tribunal held that bare-boat charter hire payments to Belgium companies are not subject to TDS under section 195, as such payments fall outside the scope of royalty under the India-Belgium DTAA, following precedent from Madras HC. For transfer pricing, the tribunal accepted the assessee's CUP method for benchmarking charter hire payments to associated enterprises, rejecting the TPO's entity-level TNMM approach and deleting the Rs. 23.46 crore adjustment, citing consistency with Mumbai ITAT decision. However, the tribunal upheld the TPO's adjustment regarding technical services payment calculation based on project turnover. The AO was directed to verify and allow TDS credits as per law.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Taxability of hire charges received by non-resident lessors under the bare charter arrangement as 'Royalty' and disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                            2. Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment related to the payment for hire of dredgers and vessels by applying the TNMM method instead of the CUP method adopted by the assessee.
                            3. TP adjustment concerning excess fees paid for technical services.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Disallowance of Bare-Boat Charter Hire Payments u/s 40(a)(i):
                            The assessee made payments to Belgium-based entities for hiring dredgers, excavators, and ships without deducting TDS, arguing that these payments were not taxable as royalty under the amended India-Belgium DTAA. The AO disagreed, treating the payments as royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) and Article 12 of the DTAA, leading to disallowance under Section 40(a)(i).

                            Upon appeal, it was clarified that the term "Royalty" in the amended DTAA (effective 01.04.1998) excluded payments for the use of industrial, commercial, or scientific equipment. The Tribunal referenced its own decision in the assessee's case for AY 2010-11 and the Madras High Court ruling in CIT vs. Van Oord ACZ Equipment BV, concluding that the payments were not taxable as royalty and the assessee was not liable for TDS. Consequently, the disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) was deleted.

                            2. Transfer Pricing Adjustment for Hire of Dredgers and Vessels:
                            The assessee benchmarked the hire charges using the CUP method based on independent valuation certificates from Bureau Veritas. The TPO rejected this method, stating that the certificates did not represent uncontrolled transactions, and instead applied entity-level TNMM, proposing an adjustment of Rs. 23.46 Crores.

                            The Tribunal noted that in subsequent years, the TPO accepted the CUP method based on similar valuation certificates. Citing the principle of consistency and the Mumbai Tribunal's decision in Van Oord Dredging and Marine Contractor BV, the Tribunal upheld the CUP method for the impugned year, rejecting the TNMM approach and deleting the TP adjustment.

                            3. TP Adjustment for Excess Fees Paid for Technical Services:
                            The assessee paid technical fees to its AE, Tideway BV, based on project turnover, which was higher than the 3% stipulated in the agreement. The TPO recalculated the fee based on the turnover in the Profit & Loss Account, proposing a downward adjustment for the excess payment.

                            The Tribunal referenced its previous decision for AY 2010-11, where it upheld the TPO's adjustment for similar facts, concluding that the assessee's payment exceeded the agreed terms. Therefore, the TP adjustment for excess fees paid was confirmed.

                            4. Short-Credit of TDS:
                            The assessee claimed that the AO granted TDS credit of Rs. 773.08 Lacs instead of Rs. 1121.01 Lacs. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify and allow the correct TDS credit in accordance with the law.

                            Conclusion:
                            The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal deleting the disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) and the TP adjustment for hire charges, while confirming the TP adjustment for excess fees paid for technical services. The issue of short-credit of TDS was remanded for verification.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found