Excise duty liability cannot be calculated on notional basis when actual production figures with CA certification are available

CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the appellant's appeal in a central excise matter. The tribunal held that excise duty liability was incorrectly calculated on notional basis despite actual production figures being available with CA certification. Cenvat credit denial on photocopies of invoices was erroneous where input receipt and utilization were undisputed. Credit disallowance on inputs used for manufacturing goods in stock was improper as the department failed to disprove CA certificate authenticity. Sugar cess cenvat credit was correctly allowed following precedent decisions. The tribunal emphasized that once sufficient evidence with CA certification is submitted, burden shifts to revenue to disprove claims.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Incorrect demand of central excise duty on a notional basis.
2. Denial of Cenvat credit on photocopies of invoices.
3. Disallowance of Cenvat credit on inputs used in the manufacture of goods lying in stock.
4. Eligibility of credit on sugar cess.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Incorrect Demand of Central Excise Duty on a Notional Basis:

The appellant contended that the methodology adopted for calculating the production figures was incorrect and not supported by any legal provisions. The actual production for the period August 2007 to March 2008 was 51,032 quintals, which was less by 3,660 quintals than the notional figure of 54,692 quintals used by the adjudicating authority, resulting in an excess duty liability of Rs. 2,67,656/-. The Tribunal found that the actual figures of production and clearances were available with the adjudicating authority, and the CA Certificate certifying the actual production figures was not disputed by the department. Therefore, the Commissioner erred in determining the duty, and the total duty determined is liable to be reduced by Rs. 2,67,656/-.

2. Denial of Cenvat Credit on Photocopies of Invoices:

The appellant submitted that the originals of the relevant purchase invoices had been submitted before the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner, but some original copies were misplaced. The adjudicating authority disallowed the Cenvat credit on the ground that Rule 9 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 specifies the documents and records for the purpose of availment of credit, and photocopies of invoices are not proper documents. However, the Tribunal noted that the receipt and utilization of inputs were not disputed, and the department did not provide any evidence to establish that the input was not received or was not duty paid. Therefore, the Commissioner erred in disallowing this part of the Cenvat credit.

3. Disallowance of Cenvat Credit on Inputs Used in the Manufacture of Goods Lying in Stock:

The appellant had an opening stock of 8,389 quintals of sugar as on 01.08.2007, which was used in the manufacture of final products cleared during the period 01.08.2007 to 30.06.2008. The adjudicating authority rejected the claim stating that the appellant did not obtain Central Excise Registration nor maintained the RG 1 Register. The Tribunal found this reasoning unacceptable and noted that the appellant had provided sufficient evidence, including a CA certificate, to substantiate their claim. The Commissioner erred in ignoring the cogent evidence led before it. Therefore, the Cenvat credit on inputs used in the manufacture of goods lying in stock should be allowed.

4. Eligibility of Credit on Sugar Cess:

The adjudicating authority allowed Cenvat credit on sugar cess based on the Karnataka High Court decision in Commissioner v. Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd. The Revenue contended that the decision was challenged before the Supreme Court and was pending. The Tribunal noted that the Karnataka High Court decision, which allowed Cenvat credit on sugar cess, was not stayed by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal also relied on similar decisions by other benches, which allowed Cenvat credit on sugar cess. Therefore, the Commissioner was correct in allowing the Cenvat credit of Sugar Cess to the appellant.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal modified the impugned order to reduce the total duty determined by Rs. 2,67,656/- and allowed the Cenvat credit on photocopies of invoices and inputs used in the manufacture of goods lying in stock. The Tribunal also upheld the eligibility of credit on sugar cess and dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue.

---