Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (6) TMI 698 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Trading loss in shares allowed as revenue failed to prove bogus transactions with specific evidence against assessee The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee's appeal against disallowance of trading loss in M/s Prraneta Industries shares. The tribunal held that despite ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Trading loss in shares allowed as revenue failed to prove bogus transactions with specific evidence against assessee

                          The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee's appeal against disallowance of trading loss in M/s Prraneta Industries shares. The tribunal held that despite allegations of bogus transactions through accommodation entries, the revenue failed to establish specific evidence linking the assessee to the alleged manipulation scheme. The assessee conducted transactions through registered stockbrokers on stock exchange with proper documentation. Given the assessee's substantial trading portfolio and sufficient brought forward losses, the disputed loss was miniscule and no prudent person would engage in bogus transactions. The tribunal emphasized that mere general allegations without specific evidence against the individual assessee cannot justify disallowance.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Disallowance of trading loss treating it as bogus loss.

                          Summary:

                          Issue 1: Disallowance of Trading Loss of Rs. 42,14,344.00
                          The assessee, engaged in the business of shares dealing, was implicated in a search and seizure operation at the premises of Shri Chandrakant Shah (SCS) and his associates. Various incriminating documents were found, indicating that SCS provided accommodation entries through intermediaries. The AO alleged that the assessee claimed a bogus trading loss in the script of M/s Prraneta Industries Ltd., amounting to Rs. 42,14,344.00. The assessee contested this, arguing that all transactions were legitimate and conducted through registered stockbrokers, with no direct evidence linking the assessee to SCS or any manipulation of share prices.

                          The AO, however, disallowed the loss, citing seized documents and statements from SCS and others, suggesting that M/s Prraneta Industries was controlled by SCS and involved in providing accommodation entries. The CIT-A upheld the AO's decision, emphasizing that the transactions were not genuine and were part of a scheme to provide accommodation entries.

                          Upon appeal, the ITAT found that the assessee conducted genuine transactions through the stock exchange, with no evidence of manipulation or collusion with SCS. The ITAT noted that the assessee had sufficient brought forward losses to absorb the disputed loss, and there was no extra tax benefit gained. The ITAT concluded that the revenue failed to establish a direct link between the assessee and any fraudulent activities, and thus, the disallowance of the trading loss was unwarranted.

                          Issue 2: Disallowance of Trading Loss of Rs. 2,44,62,330.00 for AY 2011-12
                          The issue for AY 2011-12 was identical to the previous year, except for the change of the script to Chandni Textile Engineering Industries Limited. The ITAT applied the same findings as for AY 2010-11, allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee.

                          Issue 3: Disallowance of Trading Loss of Rs. 10,14,955.00 for AY 2012-13
                          For AY 2012-13, the script involved was Chandni Textile Engineering Industries Limited and Shri Ganesh Spinners Ltd. The ITAT again applied the same findings as for AY 2010-11, allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee.

                          Issue 4: Appeals for Shri Sagar Rajesh Jhaveri for AY 2010-11, 2011-12, and 2012-13
                          The issues raised were identical to those in the case of Shri Vicky Rajesh Jhaveri for AY 2010-11, with different scripts involved. The ITAT applied the same findings, allowing all the appeals in favor of the assessee.

                          Conclusion
                          The ITAT allowed all the appeals, concluding that the trading losses claimed by the assessee were genuine and not part of any accommodation entry scheme, as alleged by the revenue. The revenue failed to provide concrete evidence linking the assessee to any fraudulent activities.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found