Business setup date differs from commencement of operations for tax purposes under Section 36

ITAT Chennai held that business setup differs from commencement of business operations. The assessee correctly adopted October 1, 2009 as setup date, making post-setup revenue expenditure allowable despite commercial production beginning February 5, 2010. Depreciation was allowed based on assets put to use from setup date. Bonus disallowance under Section 36(1)(ii) was deleted as payments constituted employee compensation for services rendered. However, the tribunal upheld capital gains addition where assessee offered mutual fund sale profits as income from other sources instead of capital gains, rejecting weighted average cost method arguments.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Disallowance of expenditure incurred during set-up of business.
2. Depreciation Disallowance.
3. Disallowance u/s 43B.
4. Addition on account of Short-Term Capital Gains.

Summary:

1. Disallowance of expenditure incurred during set-up of business:

The assessee claimed expenses related to the setup of its powertrain business, arguing that the business was set up on 01-10-2009, though commercial production began on 05-02-2010. The AO disallowed these expenses, stating that the business commenced only with commercial production. The CIT(A) upheld this view but allowed depreciation on such expenditure. The Tribunal held that the business was set up on 01-10-2009, making the expenses post this date allowable. The AO is directed to verify and allow these expenses if they relate to the service segment and are revenue in nature.

2. Depreciation Disallowance:

The AO disallowed a portion of the depreciation claimed by the assessee, stating that the assets were not put to use for the entire year. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance due to the lack of documentary evidence. The Tribunal restored the issue to the AO for fresh consideration, accepting the setup date as 01-10-2009 and directing the assessee to furnish the requisite details.

3. Disallowance u/s 43B:

The AO disallowed a payment of Rs. 277.83 Lacs, treating it as unpaid bonus. The assessee argued that it was variable pay forming part of the CTC of employees. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance. The Tribunal held that the payment was part of the CTC and not bonus u/s 36(1)(ii), thus deleting the disallowance.

4. Addition on account of Short-Term Capital Gains:

The AO added Rs. 111.31 Lacs as short-term capital gains, noting a discrepancy in the gains reported by the assessee. The CIT(A) upheld this addition. The Tribunal found that the gains on mutual funds were offered under "income from other sources," and the methodology used in the books should have been followed for tax purposes. The addition was upheld, and the corresponding grounds were dismissed.

Conclusion:

The appeal is partly allowed. Order pronounced on 3rd June, 2024.

---