Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand of service tax under Residential Complex Service was sustainable for construction contracts that were composite in nature for the period prior to 1.7.2012.
Analysis: The contracts were found to involve both materials and services and the valuation had already taken abatement for materials under Notification No. 1/2006. For the period prior to 1.7.2012, such composite construction contracts could not be taxed under Residential Complex Service. The applicable view was that demands on composite construction activity for the relevant period could be sustained only under Works Contract Service.
Conclusion: The demand of service tax under Residential Complex Service was not sustainable and was set aside.