Legal Challenge Overturned: CGST Section 73 Order Invalidated Due to Procedural Fairness and Accountant's Maternity Leave HC set aside an ex-parte demand order under Section 73 of CGST Act due to petitioner's accountant being on maternity leave. Court directed ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Legal Challenge Overturned: CGST Section 73 Order Invalidated Due to Procedural Fairness and Accountant's Maternity Leave
HC set aside an ex-parte demand order under Section 73 of CGST Act due to petitioner's accountant being on maternity leave. Court directed re-adjudication, granting petitioner four weeks to respond to Show Cause Notice. Proper Officer instructed to conduct personal hearing and pass a fresh order within prescribed period, without prejudicing parties' rights.
Issues involved: Impugning an order under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 due to a demand created against the petitioner without a reply to the Show Cause Notice.
In this case, the petitioner challenged an order dated 17.04.2024 which disposed of the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 27.12.2023 proposing a demand of Rs. 7,30,212.00 against the petitioner under Section 73 of the CGST Act. The petitioner, through counsel, explained that their accountant was on maternity leave for 12 weeks, leading to unawareness of the proceedings and inability to respond to the Show Cause Notice. The Department raised grounds related to excess claim of Input Tax Credit and excess ITC availed in GSTR-3B compared to the tax on inward supplies declared by suppliers. The impugned order created a demand ex-parte as the petitioner did not reply to the Show Cause Notice, despite the explanation provided. The Court, considering the circumstances, set aside the impugned order and directed the matter to be remitted to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication, granting the petitioner an opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice within four weeks. The Proper Officer was instructed to re-adjudicate the matter after a personal hearing and pass a fresh order within the prescribed period under Section 75(3) of the Act. The Court clarified that it did not comment on the merits of the contentions and reserved all rights and contentions of the parties. The challenge to Notification No. 9 of 2023 regarding the initial extension of time was left open, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
