Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. Here it shows just a few of many results. To view list of all cases mentioning this section, Visit here

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Settlement Commission Exceeded Jurisdiction in Imposing Penalty: Customs Act Procedural Requirements Not Followed</h1> The Court held that the Settlement Commission exceeded its jurisdiction by imposing a penalty of Rs. 50 lakh without following the procedural requirements ... It is the submission on behalf of the Petitioner that the order of Settlement Commission in imposing a penalty of Rs. 50 lacs., is beyond its jurisdiction under Section 127(C) of the Customs Act. - It is clear that the powers of the Settlement Commission to pass an order must be in accordance with the provisions of the Act, in matters covered by the application and any other matter relating to the cases referred to in the report of the Commissioner - Thus the orders can only be in respect of the matter covered by the application or included in the report of the Commissioner in answer to the application. – Penalty not contained in application for settlement or in report of Commissioner - it is clear that if there be no power under the Act to impose penalty, without complying with the requirements, the settlement commission equally would have no power to impose penalty. – Penalty not imposable on the ground of inconsistent stand of petitioner - The order of the Commission therefore, providing for penalty for settlement of the case is without jurisdiction and to that extent is liable to be set aside. Issues Involved:1. Imposition of penalty by the Settlement Commission.2. Jurisdiction of the Settlement Commission under Section 127(C) of the Customs Act.3. Compliance with procedural requirements under Section 124 of the Customs Act.4. Interpretation of powers under Section 127(F) of the Customs Act.Detailed Analysis:1. Imposition of penalty by the Settlement Commission:The Petitioner contested the imposition of a Rs. 50 lakh penalty by the Settlement Commission, arguing that it was beyond the Commission's jurisdiction under Section 127(C) of the Customs Act. The Petitioner initially admitted a duty liability of Rs. 1,23,81,895/-, which was later revised to Rs. 1,16,49,093/- due to an error in calculation. The Petitioner eventually agreed to pay Rs. 1,21,90,562/- based on a communication from the DGFT. The Settlement Commission settled the case for a Customs duty of Rs. 1,23,33,557/- along with a penalty of Rs. 50 lakh, which the Petitioner challenged.2. Jurisdiction of the Settlement Commission under Section 127(C) of the Customs Act:The Commission's jurisdiction to impose penalties was scrutinized. The Commission argued that its powers were not confined to the show cause notice and that it could pass orders as it deemed fit under Sections 127-C(7) and (9). However, the Court noted that the powers of the Settlement Commission must be exercised in accordance with the Act and could only cover matters included in the application or the Commissioner's report. The Court emphasized that the Settlement Commission's powers are not unlimited and must align with the statutory provisions.3. Compliance with procedural requirements under Section 124 of the Customs Act:Section 124 mandates that no order imposing a penalty can be made without giving the person an opportunity to make representations. The Court observed that the show cause notices issued to the Petitioner did not propose the imposition of any penalty, thus failing to comply with Section 124. The Court highlighted that the Settlement Commission must adhere to procedural requirements, and any penalty imposed without following these procedures is without jurisdiction.4. Interpretation of powers under Section 127(F) of the Customs Act:The Court examined Section 127(F), which grants the Settlement Commission powers vested in Customs officers. However, the Court clarified that even with these powers, the Commission must follow the procedural requirements of the Act. The Court referenced similar provisions in the Income Tax Act, where the Supreme Court had ruled that the Settlement Commission's powers must be exercised in conformity with the Act and not in conflict with its mandatory provisions.Conclusion:The Court concluded that the Settlement Commission had no jurisdiction to impose a penalty of Rs. 50 lakh without adhering to the procedural requirements of the Customs Act. The imposition of the penalty was deemed beyond the Commission's powers, and the order was set aside to the extent of the penalty. The rule was made absolute in terms of the Prayer Clause (a) concerning the penalty.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found