Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an application for exemption from personal appearance under Section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is maintainable in a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and whether rejection of such application by invoking Section 45 of that Act is sustainable.
Analysis: The application under Section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was held to be maintainable even in a proceeding under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The bar under Section 45 of that Act was held not to govern an for exemption from personal appearance. The Court further held that the discretion under Section 205 must be exercised cautiously and on the basis of sufficient and cogent reasons shown by the accused for inability to attend the trial court, and the trial court must decide such request on its own merits in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The rejection order was held unsustainable and was set aside. The matter was remanded to the trial court for fresh consideration of the Section 205 application in accordance with law.