TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the advance ruling required modification because it was confined to only one eligibility condition under Entry 41 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), and whether the matter should be remanded for fresh decision after considering all relevant conditions.
Analysis: Entry 41 grants exemption to the upfront amount paid for long-term lease of industrial plots where the supply is made by a State Government industrial development corporation or undertaking, or by any other entity having 20% or more ownership of the Central Government, State Government or Union Territory, subject to the specified conditions. The appellate record showed that the original ruling substantially addressed only the ownership condition of the service provider and did not record findings on the other conditions relevant to exemption eligibility. In such a situation, a complete and reasoned determination on the exemption claim could not be said to have been made. The authority therefore found it appropriate to set aside the ruling and send the matter back for fresh adjudication so that all aspects of the claim could be examined.
Conclusion: The advance ruling was set aside and the matter was remanded to the authority for fresh decision after considering all relevant aspects.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
