TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether freight retained by the assessee formed part of the assessable value under section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, in the facts where goods were delivered at the buyers' premises and VAT was paid on the factory-gate price. (ii) Whether the demand for the extended period was sustainable.
Issue (i): Whether freight retained by the assessee formed part of the assessable value under section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, in the facts where goods were delivered at the buyers' premises and VAT was paid on the factory-gate price.
Analysis: The place of removal was held to be the factory gate. The record showed payment of VAT at the factory gate and the Tribunal treated the issue as covered by the principle that freight up to the place of removal is not includible in assessable value. The Tribunal also noted that the same issue had already been decided in the assessee's favour in earlier Tribunal proceedings following the Supreme Court's ruling on the valuation of freight. The conclusion was reinforced by the view that the sale, in the present factual setting, did not shift the place of removal to the buyer's premises merely because freight was separately recovered and partly retained.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and the demand on merits was set aside.
Issue (ii): Whether the demand for the extended period was sustainable.
Analysis: The Tribunal treated the dispute as one of legal interpretation that was resolved only after the authoritative pronouncement on the valuation issue. In that setting, the allegation of suppression was not accepted and the ingredients for invoking the extended period were held not to be established.
Conclusion: The extended period demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on both merits and limitation, with consequential relief available according to law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the goods are assessed on a factory-gate basis and the dispute concerns inclusion of freight after the place of removal, freight up to the place of removal is not part of the assessable value; a bona fide interpretative dispute on such valuation issue does not by itself justify the extended period.
TaxTMI 
