Tax Dispute Dismissed: Criminal Login Allegations Deemed Beyond Writ Scope, Statutory Appeal Pathway Remains Open for Petitioner

HC dismissed writ petition challenging a tax adjudication order under CGST Act. The court held that criminal allegations of fraudulent login credential misuse fall outside constitutional writ jurisdiction. Alternative statutory appeal remedy exists, and the petitioner was afforded due process during adjudication. Petition rejected without prejudice to pursuing appropriate legal remedies.

---

---

Issues:
The judgment involves a challenge to an adjudication order u/s 73 of the CGST Act, alleging fraudulent misuse of tax payer's login credentials, and the jurisdiction of the writ court to intervene in criminal matters.

Adjudication Order Challenge:
The petitioner challenged the impugned order dated 27th December, 2023 passed u/s 73 of the CGST Act, contending that a full-fledged investigation into criminal issues related to fraudulent misuse of login credentials should have been conducted. The petitioner claimed that their user ID and password were changed fraudulently, leading to wrongful gain for another party and wrongful loss for the petitioner.

Jurisdiction of Writ Court:
The court questioned the jurisdiction of the writ court to entertain criminal allegations under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It noted that the impugned order was appellable under the statute, the adjudication process was conducted lawfully, and the petitioner had the opportunity to participate without any denial of hearing. The court emphasized that the issue raised was purely criminal in nature, falling outside the scope of constitutional writ jurisdiction.

Precedent Distinction:
The judgment distinguished a precedent cited by the petitioner, where the court exercised extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 in a different context. The court highlighted that the cited case did not involve criminal allegations, unlike the present case. It was noted that the petitioner's reliance on the precedent was not applicable due to the differing factual and legal circumstances.

Dismissal and Alternative Remedy:
Ultimately, the writ petition was dismissed on the grounds of the availability of an alternative remedy through a statutory appeal against the impugned adjudication order u/s 73 of the CGST Act. The dismissal was clarified not to prevent the petitioner from seeking appropriate remedies through other legal forums in accordance with the criminal nature of the allegations.

---