TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Corporate Guarantor Appeal Dismissed; No Claims Against New Management Under IBC, Section 140 Inapplicable.</h1> The SC dismissed the appeal, determining no basis to challenge the impugned judgment. The appellant, as a corporate guarantor, is not entitled to claims ... Rejection of claim of the Appellant(s) to be declared as Financial Creditors of the Corporate Debtor - it was held by NCLAT that The condition for declaring the Appellant(s) as ‘Financial Creditor’ are not satisfied in the claims submitted by the Appellant(s) and both Resolution Professional and Adjudicating Authority have rightly rejected their claims as ‘Financial Creditor’ for valid reasons - HELD THAT:- There are no good ground and reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and hence, the present appeal is dismissed. In the present case, the appellant - Skil Infrastructure Limited is a corporate guarantor as per Section 5(5A) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Its claim against the second/ new promoters/management will not make them a financial creditor against the corporate debtor itself. Section 140 of the Contract Act, 1872 cannot be pressed and is not applicable. Application disposed off. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal as it found no good ground to interfere with the impugned judgment. The appellant, Skil Infrastructure Limited, as a corporate guarantor, cannot claim against the new promoters/management under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Section 140 of the Contract Act, 1872 is not applicable in this case. Pending applications will be disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
