Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment proceedings based on the earlier view that the sale value of exempt de-oiled rice bran could be excluded were sustainable after the Supreme Court held that such sale value must be included for the purpose of the exclusion under the Uttar Pradesh VAT regime.
Analysis: The petition challenged the order extending limitation and the consequential reassessment notice for assessment year 2012-13. The reassessment was founded on the view that the petitioner had escaped assessment because the benefit of input tax credit had allegedly been wrongly granted on purchase of rice bran. The legal basis for that action stood displaced once the Supreme Court declared that, notwithstanding the exempt nature of the by-product, its sale value had to be taken into account while applying the relevant exclusion under Section 13 of the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act. In view of that declaration, the premise that turnover had escaped assessment could no longer be sustained.
Conclusion: The reassessment proceedings could not be sustained and the petitioner succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The impugned reassessment action was quashed, and the writ petition was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: When the legal foundation of reassessment is removed by a binding declaration that the relevant turnover or sale value must be included in the statutory computation, proceedings alleging escaped assessment cannot survive.