Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether receipts from sublicensing of standardised software tools to Indian affiliates were taxable as income from other sources under the Income-tax Act and the India-USA DTAA, or were to be treated as business income not taxable in India in the absence of a permanent establishment.
Analysis: The receipts arose from sublicensing of software used by the Indian affiliates in their business operations. The decisive question was whether such receipts could be recharacterised as residuary income under section 56(1) and Article 23(3), or whether they were in substance business receipts that, in the absence of a permanent establishment in India, could not be taxed as business profits. The order followed the earlier coordinate bench view and the Supreme Court decision in Engineering Analysis, holding that software sublicensing receipts do not become taxable merely because they are not taxed as royalty, and that the residuary article cannot be invoked where the income is otherwise classifiable under the business profits article.
Conclusion: The receipts from sublicensing of standardised software were not taxable as income from other sources and could not be brought to tax in India as business income in the absence of a permanent establishment. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where software sublicensing receipts are properly characterised as business receipts and the non-resident has no permanent establishment in India, they cannot be taxed under the residuary income article merely because they are not taxable as royalty.