Business income classification for software sub-licensing receipts; absent a permanent establishment, India taxation failed.

Receipts from the sub-licensing of standard software licences on a cost-to-cost basis were held to be business income, not residuary income under section 56(1) or Article 23(3) of the India-USA DTAA. The tribunal applied the principle that the residuary head and the treaty's other-income article operate only where income cannot be classified under a specific head, and that income capable of being characterised as royalty or business income cannot be shifted to other income merely because the charging article does not apply. As the activity was regular, continuous and used in the affiliates' operations, the receipts fell under Article 7 and, in the absence of a permanent establishment in India, were not taxable. The addition was deleted.

---

---

Issues: Whether receipts from sub-licensing of software licences to Indian affiliates constituted income from other sources under section 56(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 23(3) of the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, or were to be characterised as business income not taxable in India in the absence of a permanent establishment.

Analysis: The receipts arose from the assessee's procurement of standard software licences from third-party licensors and onward sub-licensing to its Indian affiliates on a cost-to-cost basis. The software was used as a business tool in the affiliates' day-to-day operations, and the activity was not a one-off transaction but showed regularity, continuity and frequency. The residuary head of income under section 56(1) applies only where an item does not fall under any specific head, while Article 23(3) operates only for income not dealt with by the preceding treaty articles. Income that is capable of being classified as royalty or business income cannot be recharacterised as other income merely because it is not taxable under the relevant charging article due to failure of conditions such as absence of a permanent establishment.

Conclusion: The receipts could not be taxed as other income under Article 23(3). They were classifiable as business income under Article 7 and, in the absence of a permanent establishment in India, were not taxable. The addition was directed to be deleted.

---