Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether VAT expenses paid by a State-owned liquor wholesaler were disallowable under section 40(a)(iib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The issue was treated as covered by the Supreme Court's ruling that section 40(a)(iib) applies to specified fees and charges, but not to tax. VAT under the Chhattisgarh Value Added Sales Tax Act, 2003 was treated as a tax, and therefore outside the scope of the disallowance provision. The Tribunal followed its own coordinate-bench view in the assessee's earlier years and found no reason to depart from that position.
Conclusion: The VAT payment was not hit by section 40(a)(iib), and the disallowance was unsustainable.