Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether corrugated board manufactured with a fifth ply of hessian laminated with kraft paper by bitumen could be treated as being manufactured partly out of bitumenised paper so as to attract the exemption under Notification No. 46/71, as amended.
Analysis: The notification exempted corrugated board falling within the specified description and, for clause (b) of the second proviso, covered board produced partly out of kraft paper and partly out of bitumenised paper. The decisive question was whether the presence of a layer of hessian in the laminated product took the paper outside the expression "bitumenised paper". The Tribunal held that it did not. The product remained classifiable as bitumenised paper for the purpose of the notification, particularly in light of the earlier view that a coated paper does not cease to answer its descriptive classification merely because another material is used in combination with it. The trade notices also supported the view that hessian laminated waterproof paper was treated as paper of the relevant class.
Conclusion: The corrugated board was covered by Serial No. 3 and clause (b) of the second proviso to Notification No. 46/71, and the exemption was available to the appellants.