Natural justice in customs classification: denial of chemical testing and hearing led to waiver of pre-deposit and remand.

Failure to allow chemical testing of seized goods, where cotton predominance was material to classification, and failure to grant the promised further hearing breached natural justice. The assessee had sought examination of the goods, but the request was ignored, and no additional opportunity of hearing was given before adjudication. On that basis, the tribunal found a strong prima facie case, waived pre-deposit of duty and penalty, and remanded the matter for de novo adjudication after hearing the assessee and considering the testing request.

---

---

Issues: Whether the adjudication order was vitiated by failure to allow chemical testing of the seized goods and by denial of full opportunity of hearing, and whether, in view of the prima facie case, pre-deposit of duty and penalty should be dispensed with.

Analysis: The record showed that the assessee had specifically sought chemical examination of the goods to determine whether cotton predominated by weight, which was material to classification. There was nothing to show that this request had been withdrawn, yet it was ignored while deciding the classification and demand. The record also showed that after an earlier hearing the matter was proposed to be taken up again after inspection of records and filing of final reply, but no further opportunity was afforded before adjudication. The failure to grant the requested test and the failure to provide the promised further hearing amounted to violation of the principles of natural justice. On that basis, the tribunal found a strong prima facie case for dispensing with pre-deposit.

Conclusion: The adjudication order was held to be unsustainable for breach of natural justice, pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived, and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing and considering the test request.

---