Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether additional duty of customs was chargeable on goods imported while exempt from such duty but cleared from bond after the exemption was withdrawn.
Analysis: The dispute concerned drug intermediates imported before the withdrawal of exemption and removed from a bonded warehouse afterwards. The governing principle applied was that where customs duty liability survives, the duty position is determined with reference to the date of clearance from the warehouse, and not merely the date of importation. Since the goods were not exempt from basic customs duty and the exemption from additional duty had ceased by the time of clearance, the duty became payable when the goods were removed from the warehouse.
Conclusion: Additional duty was rightly levied, and the challenge by the assessee failed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were sustained, and the appeals stood dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where imported goods are cleared from a bonded warehouse after withdrawal of the exemption, customs duty liability is governed by the law and exemption position prevailing on the date of clearance.