Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether coloured polystyrene compound was classifiable under Tariff Item 15-A(1)(ii) and whether central excise duty was payable only at the coloured stage on removal from the factory, instead of at the uncoloured stage.
Analysis: The order followed the Tribunal's earlier decision in the same assessee's case and held that colouring of uncoloured polystyrene in the same factory did not result in a new commodity. In view of Rule 9 of the Central Excise Rules, excisable goods used within the factory after processing are deemed to have been removed immediately before such consumption or utilisation. As the goods were captively consumed for colouring and were liable to duty only when removed after that process, the claim that duty had to be assessed on the uncoloured stage was rejected.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Tariff Item 15-A(1)(ii), and excise duty was held payable at the time of removal of the coloured polystyrene compound on its coloured value, subject to limitation.