Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether raw rabbit skins imported by the appellants were entitled to exemption from countervailing duty under the cited Central Excise notifications.
Analysis: Countervailing duty under section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act was attracted if the imported goods corresponded to excisable goods under the Central Excise Tariff. The exemption notifications relied upon operated only if the goods satisfied the specified conditions, namely that they were not manufactured in a factory or that no process in or in relation to their manufacture was ordinarily carried on with the aid of power. The record did not establish fulfilment of either condition, and a mere assertion in appeal was insufficient to prove entitlement to exemption.
Conclusion: The claim for exemption from countervailing duty was rejected and the finding was against the appellants.