Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Phenol USP grade was entitled to exemption under the amended customs/excise notification, and whether the matter required remand for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The claim for concession rested on the product's eligibility under Notification No. 234/82-C.E. as amended by Notification No. 174/83. The prior view of the Tribunal was treated as displaced by the Bombay High Court's later decision holding the same product to be a drug and drug intermediate under the predecessor Notification No. 55/75-C.E. The existence of that High Court ruling made remand unnecessary, since the relief already granted by the lower appellate authority was supported on the basis of the same product's classification in the later judgment.
Conclusion: The product was treated as eligible for the exemption, and the request for remand was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The impugned relief in favour of the importer was sustained and the departmental appeals failed.