Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether phenol USP was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 55/75 dated 1 March 1975 as a drug or drug intermediate, so as to escape countervailing duty.
Analysis: The imported product was found to be included in recognised pharmacopoeias and supported by material showing use as a preservative and as a raw material or intermediate in pharmaceutical manufacture. The exemption notification covered all drugs, medicines, pharmaceuticals and drug intermediates not elsewhere specified, and the Court held that no additional requirement could be read into the notification that the importer must prove actual end-use beyond the character of the goods. On the material placed, phenol USP was treated as both a drug and a drug intermediate.
Conclusion: The benefit of the exemption notification was available, and the import of phenol USP was not liable to countervailing duty.