Manufacturer-based MODVAT exemption denied where one factory had taken credit, despite another unit not availing it.

Notification No. 175/86-C.E. was construed as applying the exemption condition to the manufacturer, not to each factory separately. The Tribunal held that where one unit of a multi-factory manufacturer had availed MODVAT credit, the manufacturer could not claim full exemption for first clearances from another unit merely because that unit had not itself taken credit. The phrase "any other case" was read in the context of the notification as a whole, and budget speech or prior notifications were not treated as overriding the plain language of the exemption scheme. Full exemption was therefore denied for the Kharia unit's first clearances.

---

---

Issues: Whether, under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. dated 01.03.1986, a manufacturer who had availed MODVAT credit in one factory could still claim full exemption on first clearances from another factory of the same manufacturer where no such credit had been availed.

Analysis: The notification used the term "manufacturer" and not "factory" in the relevant exemption clause. Read as a whole, it drew a clear distinction between a manufacturer and a factory, and the exemption scheme applied on the basis of the manufacturer's availing of the credit facility. The provision for full exemption in "any other case" could not be confined to one factory of a multi-factory manufacturer merely because credit was not taken in that particular unit. The Tribunal also held that the budget speech and prior notifications did not alter the plain language of the exemption notification.

Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to full duty exemption for the first clearances of the Kharia unit merely because MODVAT credit had been availed only by the Kanpur unit; the denial of full exemption was upheld, against the assessee.

---