Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported coil winding machine was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 118/80-Cus. as a machine designed for use in the electronic industry.
Analysis: The claim to exemption depended on showing that the machine was designed for use in the electronic industry. The machine was described as an automatic precision coil winding machine, but the catalogue did not support that description. The appellants could show only that the wire feeding function was automatic and that other functions were not automatic, making the machine merely semi-automatic. They also failed to establish that the coils produced were exclusively for the electronic industry by reason of their rating, size, or functional characteristics, or that any feature of the machine made it specially useful for that industry.
Conclusion: The machine was not proved to be designed for use in the electronic industry and was not eligible for exemption under Notification No. 118/80-Cus.
Final Conclusion: The exemption claim failed and the assessment made by the lower authorities was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: To claim exemption under a notification limited to machinery designed for use in the electronic industry, the importer must establish from the machine's design and function that it is specially suited to that industry; a merely semi-automatic general-purpose machine does not qualify.