Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported cutters for rotor were classifiable under Heading 85.45/48 of the Customs Tariff Act or under Heading 82.05, and whether the section note to Section XVI permitted classification under Chapter 84.
Analysis: The Bill of Entry and invoice showed the milling machine and the cutters as separate items with separate values. Section Note 1(ij) to Section XVI made it clear that goods classifiable under Chapter 82 could not be classified under Chapter 84. Heading 82.05 specifically covered cutting tools.
Conclusion: The cutters were correctly classified under Heading 82.05 and not under Heading 85.45/48. The appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the customs authorities was upheld and the appellant obtained no relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the invoice and entry show the machine and the cutters as separate goods, and the tariff note excludes Chapter 82 goods from Chapter 84, the cutters must be classified under the specific cutting-tools heading.