Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported vertical main shaft was entitled to the benefit of exemption Notification No. 350/76-Customs and whether the refund claim should be remanded for verification of compliance with the notification conditions.
Analysis: The refund claim was supported on the footing that the vertical main shaft formed part of the initial assembly of a bowl mill, the bowl mill was covered by the tariff heading specified in the exemption notification, and the duty relief under the notification corresponded to the refund amount claimed. The department did not dispute the availability of the notification in principle, but sought verification of fulfillment of the notification conditions, including end-use certification. The appellants accepted that course.
Conclusion: The claim was held tenable in principle under Notification No. 350/76-Customs, and the matter was remanded to the Assistant Collector for sanction of the claim upon verification of compliance with the remaining conditions.