Exemption notification benefit depends on timely end-use certificates, and multiple-use goods do not by themselves defeat the claim.

Imported boiler components were considered eligible for exemption under Notification No. 35/79-Cus. because the Essentiality Certificate and End-use Certificate satisfied the notification conditions when filed in time and established the required end-use correlation. The fact that the goods were identifiable items capable of multiple uses did not defeat the claim where the prescribed supporting certificates were produced and verified. The contrary rejection was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration limited to granting the notification benefit after verification of the certificates.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported boiler components were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 35/79-Cus. on the basis of the Essentiality Certificate and End-use Certificate.

Analysis: The certificates produced with the refund claim were examined and found to satisfy the conditions prescribed by the notification. The fact that the goods were treated as identifiable items having multiple uses did not disqualify the claim where the required certificates were filed in time and established the necessary end-use correlation.

Conclusion: The imported goods were held entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 35/79-Cus., and the contrary rejection was set aside.

Final Conclusion: The matter was sent back for fresh consideration limited to granting the notification benefit after verification of the Essentiality and End-use Certificates.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the conditions of an exemption notification are satisfied by timely supporting certificates, the benefit cannot be denied merely because the imported goods are capable of multiple uses.

---