Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the processed cotton fabric subjected to wax emulsion was classifiable as water-proofed cloth rather than as bleached and dyed fabrics or water-repellant cloth.
Analysis: The goods were cotton fabrics treated with wax emulsion to fill the interstices, reduce air permeability to a negligible extent, and eliminate water permeability. The controlling guidance was the earlier Bombay High Court decision on the same type of fabric, which held that such cloth was to be treated as water-proofed cloth. The applied principle was that the proper classification had to follow the nature and effect of the processing as already judicially determined on identical facts.
Conclusion: The fabric was held classifiable as water-proofed cloth and not as bleached or dyed fabrics or water-repellant cloth, with consequential relief to the assessee.