Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Lauryl alcohol was classifiable under Heading 15.08/13 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as claimed by the assessee or under Heading 29.01/45 as claimed by the department.
Analysis: The Tribunal found that the controversy had already been covered by its earlier order on the same classification dispute. It held that the grounds raised by the department had been exhaustively dealt with in that prior decision and that no new ground justified a different view in the present appeals.
Conclusion: The goods were not held classifiable under Heading 15.08/13 as claimed by the assessee. The departmental classification under Heading 29.01/45 was accepted and the appeals were rejected.