Exemption for seamless steel tubes failed where running-length imports and unsupported alternative classification did not match the notification conditions.

Imported seamless steel tubes in running length were held ineligible for exemption under Notification No. 350/76-Cus because the condition of import did not match the notification's coverage. The alternative plea for assessment under sub-heading 73.17/19(3) as boiler quality tubes was rejected because no supporting material had been produced before the lower authorities, and the end-use certificate showed use in compressors rather than the claimed purpose. On that basis, the exemption claim and alternative classification were both refused, and the lower authorities' order was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether seamless steel tubes imported in running length were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 350/76-Cus, and whether the goods could alternatively be assessed under sub-heading 73.17/19(3) as boiler quality tubes.

Analysis: The imported tubes were found to be in running length, which disentitled the claimant from the exemption under Notification No. 350/76-Cus. The alternative classification plea was also rejected because no supporting material had been produced before the lower authorities, and the end-use certificate recorded that the goods were used in compressors.

Conclusion: The claim for exemption and the alternative plea for assessment under sub-heading 73.17/19(3) were rejected.

Final Conclusion: The order of the lower authorities was upheld and the appeal failed.

Ratio Decidendi: An exemption claim based on a specific end use cannot be allowed when the goods are imported in a condition not covered by the notification and the supporting factual basis for an alternative classification is absent.

---