Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported "Spot Cleaning Gun" was correctly classifiable as a spray gun under Heading 84.21(2) of the Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, rather than under Heading 84.21(1) or Heading 84.59.
Analysis: The imported article was treated as the same goods described in the leaflet and as a spray gun used with solvent for removing stains from fabrics. The classification turned on the proper construction of Heading 84.21. The description of sub-item (2) covered spray guns as a class of goods, while the words relating to paint, varnish, oil, distemper or cement qualified only similar appliances. The reference to principal purpose did not displace the tariff description where the goods were found to be spray guns.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Heading 84.21(2) of the Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, and the assessee's claim to a different classification failed.