Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the sum of Rs. 25,000 was assessable in the assessee's hands as income under the managing agency agreement; (ii) Whether the said sum, if accrued, was allowable as a deduction on the footing of waiver or surrender on grounds of commercial expediency.
Issue (i): Whether the sum of Rs. 25,000 was assessable in the assessee's hands as income under the managing agency agreement.
Analysis: The remuneration clause entitled the managing agent to 15% of the net profits with a minimum amount of Rs. 25,000 in case of inadequacy of profits. Read as a whole, the clause fixed a minimum commission payable to the assessee irrespective of the exact level of profits, and the right to receive that amount accrued in the relevant year.
Conclusion: The sum of Rs. 25,000 was assessable in the hands of the assessee as income.
Issue (ii): Whether the said sum, if accrued, was allowable as a deduction on the footing of waiver or surrender on grounds of commercial expediency.
Analysis: The finding of the Tribunal was that there was no actual waiver of the amount by the assessee. In the absence of a conscious surrender, the claim to deduction on grounds of commercial expediency could not arise.
Conclusion: The deduction claim was not allowable and the issue was answered against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: Both referred questions were answered against the assessee, and the reference was disposed of accordingly.