Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the stay proceedings, pre-deposit of the adjudged duty and penalty should be dispensed with on the basis of a strong prima facie case arising from the classification of body-built motor vehicles and the applicability of the exemption notification.
Analysis: The application was considered against a prior High Court decision holding that body building of motor vehicles falls under the relevant tariff heading and may qualify for exemption under the notification, subject to the turnover condition. The Tribunal treated that decision as furnishing a strong prima facie basis in favour of the applicants and rejected the objection that the High Court ruling lacked applicability in view of the Tribunal's all-India jurisdiction.
Conclusion: Pre-deposit of the duty and penalty was dispensed with unconditionally, and recovery of the adjudged amounts was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.