Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the detention order was liable to be quashed because the detenu was arrested without being furnished with the detention order and grounds of detention when taken into custody.
Analysis: The detention was ordered under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974. The material showed that the detenu was taken into custody on the basis of the impugned detention order, but the order and grounds were not served on him at that time. The return did not dispute that the custody was directly referable to the detention order, and the later service of the order and grounds did not cure the initial failure to communicate them when the detenu was arrested.
Conclusion: The detention was illegal and the detention order could not be sustained.