Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported universal measuring machine was entitled to concessional assessment under Notification No. 49/78-Cus. on the basis that, with necessary accessories, it was capable of performing the measurements described in the notification.
Analysis: The relevant criterion was the machine's design and capacity to perform the specified measurements, not the accidental absence of every accessory at the point of importation. The notification had to be read to cover a machine which, with the help of accessories where needed, could conduct the listed measurements. Since the imported machine was capable of doing so with appropriate accessories, the benefit of the notification could not be denied.
Conclusion: The imported goods were held entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 49/78-Cus., and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
Final Conclusion: Exemption under the notification could not be refused merely because all accessories were not imported, where the machine itself was capable of the notified functions with the necessary accessories.
Ratio Decidendi: For exemption under a notification describing functional capability, the decisive test is whether the imported goods are capable of performing the specified function with necessary accessories, rather than whether every accessory is physically present at importation.