Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a private nursing home with indoor facilities could be treated as a hospital for the purpose of import entitlement under the Import Policy, and whether the State Government certificate amounted to recognition for import under Appendix 6 Item 5.
Analysis: Appendix 6 Item 20(1) permitted hospitals and medical institutions to import medical and allied instruments and appliances for their own use without requiring recognition by the Central or State Government, and the imported goods were within the prescribed value limit. A nursing home with indoor treatment facilities was held to fall within the expression "hospital". Independently, Appendix 6 Item 5 applied to hospitals recognised by the Central or State Government, and the State Government certificate was treated as sufficient recognition for the purpose of the policy. The objection to import was therefore unsustainable.
Conclusion: The importer was entitled to clearance of the microscope and incubator, and the confiscation and redemption fine could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the import was held permissible under the relevant policy entry, resulting in setting aside of the confiscation and the consequential fine.
Ratio Decidendi: A nursing home with indoor facilities may qualify as a hospital for import policy purposes, and where the policy does not require governmental recognition for the relevant entry, import entitlement cannot be denied on that ground.