Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the deregistration of the petitioners for alleged export deficiencies was invalid for want of a personal hearing and breach of natural justice.
Analysis: The petitioners were issued a show cause notice, supplied with the complaint, called upon to furnish shipment details and given repeated opportunities to submit detailed written explanations and documents. The registerting authority considered the entire material before passing the deregistration order under paragraph 271 of the Hand Book of Import-Export Procedure, 1978-79. Although a personal hearing had been sought and mentioned in correspondence, the circumstances showed that the petitioners had a full opportunity to present their case and that the decision turned on the documentary material already before the authority. In such circumstances, a personal hearing was not mandatory and its absence did not amount to violation of natural justice.
Conclusion: The challenge to the deregistration order failed and the absence of a personal hearing did not vitiate the decision.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a party has been given effective notice and a meaningful opportunity to make a written representation and produce documents, failure to grant a personal hearing does not, by itself, constitute breach of natural justice unless prejudice is shown.