Statutory lien for demurrage survives transfer to bonded warehouse, preserving the right to auction goods after notice.

Removal of goods to a bonded warehouse did not prejudice the appellant's statutory lien, if any, for demurrage charges. The lien was held to continue to attach to the goods despite their transfer, because the removal was permitted under the Court's order and on the respondents' express consent. The appellant's consequential right to auction the goods for non-payment, after notice, was also preserved.

---

---

Issues: Whether removal of the goods to a bonded warehouse would affect the appellant's statutory lien, if any, for demurrage charges and its right to auction the goods in case of non-payment.

Analysis: The removal of the goods was permitted under the Court's order and on the express consent of the respondents. The Court clarified that such removal would not prejudice the appellant's statutory lien, if any, in respect of demurrage charges, and that the lien would continue to attach to the goods despite their removal. The appellant's right to auction the goods in the event of non-payment after notice was also preserved.

Conclusion: The appellant's statutory lien, if any, remained protected and attached to the goods after removal to the bonded warehouse, along with the consequential right to auction the goods for unpaid demurrage after notice.

---