Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product marketed as CALPOL was classifiable as maleic resin and therefore entitled to exemption under Notification No. 157/81-C.E. dated 29-8-1981.
Analysis: The product was manufactured by polycondensation of maleic anhydride with polyhydric alcohols and then modified with other acids, with styrene used as a diluent. The notification itself supplied the governing definition of maleic resin, so the question had to be answered by applying that definition rather than by substituting general scientific descriptions. The competing expert reports could be used only as aids on technical composition, not for interpreting the notification or concluding whether the legal definition was satisfied. On the material before it, the product satisfied the essential ingredients of the notification and the presence of styrene, whether as a reactive diluent or otherwise, did not take it outside the exempted description.
Conclusion: The product was held to be maleic resin within the meaning of the exemption notification and the claim for exemption was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification defines the tariff description, classification must be determined by the statutory definition in the notification itself, and technical opinions cannot override that legal meaning.