Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a self-starter motor is classifiable as an electric motor under Item 30 of the Central Excise Tariff, or as parts and accessories of motor vehicles under Item 34A, or under the residuary Item 68.
Analysis: The self-starter motor was found to be an electric motor in substance and function. It operates on the same basic principle as other electric motors, contains the usual motor components, and is understood in trade, technical usage, and common parlance as a motor used to crank an automobile engine. Item 34A was inapplicable because motor vehicle parts specified elsewhere could not be taken there, and the residuary Item 68 could not be used when the article squarely answered to a specific tariff description. The decision applied the settled principle that classification must be made under the most appropriate specific entry, with the residuary heading resorted to only when no specific entry fits.
Conclusion: The self-starter motor is correctly classifiable under Item 30 of the Central Excise Tariff and not under Item 34A or Item 68.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an article answers the description of a specific tariff entry by its essential nature, function, and trade understanding, that specific entry prevails over a general or residuary entry.