Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported tube valves were classifiable under Heading 84.61(2) as non-return valves or as corrosion resistant valves, instead of under Heading 84.61(1).
Analysis: The imported goods were tube valves used in inner tubes for filling and drawing air. The material on record did not show that such valves were known in trade as non-return valves, and the evidence did not establish that they functioned only in one direction in the sense required of non-return valves. The alternate plea that the valves were corrosion resistant also failed, because no evidence was produced to show the nature of the corrosive fluid they were meant to withstand, the composition of the alloy, or that the rubber covering was provided to give corrosion resistance.
Conclusion: The goods were not proved to be non-return valves or corrosion resistant valves under Heading 84.61(2); the classification under Heading 84.61(1) was upheld against the assessee.