Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioners, having earned replenishment entitlement under the earlier import-export policy, could be denied the full replenishment licence by applying restrictions introduced under the subsequent policy.
Analysis: The petitioners had completed the export obligation under the policy in force when the right to replenishment accrued. Paragraph 254 of Chapter 23 of the Import Export Policy of 1984 governed transitional cases, but it did not authorise curtailment of the replenishment entitlement where the item of import remained the same and there was no change in the overall replenishment due. The later policy could not take away the entitlement already earned under the earlier regime.
Conclusion: The restriction imposed in the replenishment licence was not sustainable, and the petitioners were entitled to have the licence issued on the basis of the earlier policy without the impugned ceiling.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded, and the petitioners obtained relief against application of the later policy restrictions to their accrued replenishment entitlement.
Ratio Decidendi: A policy change cannot retrospectively curtail a replenishment entitlement that has already accrued under the earlier policy where the transitional provision does not expressly authorise such restriction.