Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refusal to renew registration of a firm under section 26A was valid when the assessee failed to comply with notice to produce accounts and the assessment was made under section 23(4), and whether separate prior notice was required before such refusal.
Analysis: The assessment year was 1947-48. Notice had been issued requiring production of books, but the assessee failed to comply. On that failure, the power under section 23(4) to proceed to best judgment assessment and to refuse registration was attracted. The statutory scheme drew a distinction between cancellation of an already granted registration and refusal to register or renew registration. The proviso to section 23(4) expressly required notice for cancellation, but it did not provide for a separate notice in cases of refusal to register or renew. The absence of express notice language for refusal of renewal could not be read into the provision. The authorities were therefore justified in refusing renewal without any further prior notice, and no prejudice from lack of opportunity was shown.
Conclusion: The refusal to renew registration was held to be legal and valid, and the question was answered in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favour of the revenue.