Excise duty refund limitation turns on cancelled gate passes, Rule 173G(2) compliance, and Section 11B time bar.

Refund of excise duty debited in a personal ledger account against cancelled gate passes was examined on the interaction between Section 11B limitation and the cancellation procedure under Rule 173G(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Tribunal treated compliance with Rule 173G(2) as material to whether credit could be taken back in the account current and considered whether the refund application, routed through the department after cancellation and replacement of gate passes, was time-barred. The legal question was directed to be referred to the High Court, and the reference application was allowed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the claim for refund of excise duty debited in the personal ledger account against cancelled gate passes was barred by limitation under Section 11B, where the cancellation was not in accordance with Rule 173G(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Analysis: The reference application concerned only the legal question whether the refund claim, arising from duty debited against gate passes that were cancelled and later replaced, was governed by the limitation period under Section 11B. The Tribunal treated compliance with Rule 173G(2) as material to the right to take credit back in the account current and examined whether the refund application, made after the departmental routing of the claim, was time-barred. The matter therefore turned on the interaction between the refund limitation provision and the procedure for cancellation of gate passes under the self-removal scheme.

Conclusion: The question was directed to be referred to the High Court, and the reference application was allowed.

---