Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the licensing authority could insert a restrictive condition in an export house import licence so as to deny the petitioner the facility otherwise available under the import policy, and whether such condition was sustainable on the basis of alleged existing instructions or the policy.
Analysis: The licence was issued under the statutory import-control regime and the relevant policy conferred facilities on a recognised export house. The restrictive condition inserted in the licence was not shown to rest on any disclosed or lawful authority, and the respondents failed to place a proper return before the Court. A licensing authority cannot, by reference to undisclosed instructions or its own interpretation of the policy, add a condition that defeats the rights flowing from the policy and the licence.
Conclusion: The restrictive condition was held unsustainable and liable to be deleted, and the petitioner was entitled to revalidation of the licence for the period directed by the Court.
Final Conclusion: The petitioner succeeded in obtaining deletion of the impugned licence condition and consequential renewal relief, with costs.
Ratio Decidendi: A licensing authority cannot impose a condition in an issued licence on the basis of undisclosed instructions or its own interpretation of the policy when the condition has the effect of defeating the rights otherwise conferred by the governing import policy.