Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether oxygen gas conveyed through a pipeline from the appellants' plant to another unit, and thereafter compressed into cylinders and containers by that unit, was liable to Central Excise duty in the hands of the appellants as compressed gas under Item 14 of the Central Excise Tariff.
Analysis: The controlling principle applied was that compressed gas means gas compressed into a container at a specified pressure for storage, handling, and transport, and not gas moving through a pipeline in a plant under pressure only slightly above atmospheric pressure. Following the earlier Tribunal decisions and the Supreme Court's view relied upon therein, the gas produced by the appellants and supplied through pipeline did not answer that description at the stage when it left the appellants' premises. The later objections on jurisdiction and limitation were not examined, the merits having been decided for the appellants.
Conclusion: The oxygen gas was not liable to Central Excise duty in the hands of the appellants.
Final Conclusion: The demand was unsustainable and the order confirming duty liability was set aside, with restoration of the Assistant Collector's orders dropping the demands.
Ratio Decidendi: Gas in pipeline form is not "compressed gas" for excise purposes unless it is compressed into a container for storage, handling, or transport.